Blackburn Does Not Burn Brightly, Says Herr D

 

Herr D's "TickTock TickTock TickTock" on heromachine.com. Blackburn has been described by some bloggers as 'cuckoo.' Herr D suggests she is a backward thinker.-Shelob

Can you analyze these statements? In order? Topic identified by titlebot.  [presents snippet from Blackburn’s questioning of Jackson]

I don’t have very long But alright. Blackburn (R. Tenn.} tries to lay common ground, as if she’s going to make Judge Jackson vulnerable by making her think she identifies with her—the ‘R’ by ‘Blackburn’ on everything makes it clear she won’t more than she must.  [presents snippet from Blackburn’s questioning of Jackson]

Then she casually jabs at the judge, pointing out Jackson approved of a ‘progressive’ curriculum. THAT’S NOT THE SAME THING AS A PROGRESSIVE POLITICAL AGENDA. A progressive curriculum is one that educates students with updated science and to their maturing needs.

Then she picks at the difference between pedophilia and child predator. Anyone who studies the matter long enough to talk publicly will learn the difference. We really shouldn’t insult people smart enough to read this blog with an explanation. Blackburn is obviously not qualified to write any legislation on this topic, though she claims she is. Presumably, the predatorial actions cannot be predated. That would be one way a pedophile would not be a child predator.

Yeah, this isn’t ‘Minority Report.’ We have to have a crime committed before we prosecute. Aren’t there a number of Republicans, including senators that ARE sex offenders? Yes. [presents snippet from Blackburn’s questioning of Jackson]

Then she tries to say Congress will have her talk about things she’s not allowed to.

Then she picks at the difference between pedophilia and child predator AGAIN. Twice. Two different ways.

Judge Jackson is clearly better at suffering idiocy than I am.

When Blackburn said that the KIDS don’t understand, that is NOT ANYONE’S CONCERN. It was a pointless, stupid thing to say, which is probably why Jackson smiled. [presents snippet from Blackburn’s questioning of Jackson]

There was a friendly question where Blackburn essentially asked Jackson a memory question and didn’t even elicit an opinion? Pointless. [presents snippet from Blackburn’s questioning of Jackson]

Then Blackburn tries to get her to talk about things she’s not allowed to. Twice. [presents snippet from Blackburn’s questioning of Jackson]

Then Blackburn ignores the results of a case, ignores half of what Jackson said in a particular instance and tries to make it sound like she meant the opposite of what she did say by quoting her QUOTING OTHER PEOPLE. Blackburn interrupts her twice, not letting her finish as soon as she begins to explain either time. Blackburn also claims she’ll run out of time and drags out her words to take up the time so Jackson can’t answer. [presents snippet from Blackburn’s questioning of Jackson]

On the next question, Jackson restrategizes. She stops thanking Blackburn and simplifies her answer to a straight ‘no’ and expands only to say that she wasn’t talking about the same thing it’s claimed she was talking about. [presents snippet from Blackburn’s questioning of Jackson]

Then Blackburn says she’ll give Jackson a tough one in writing and plays to the camera that [the American people] “expect this of us.’ Blackburn admitted Jackson was gracious and jabs at some word choices while doing some more mild grandstanding.

I wish I could say that Blackburn is less intelligent, less well-spoken, less abrasive, less shallow, less false, and less statesperson-like than most of Congress. I’m afraid it’s the opposite. Subjective ratios preprogrammed correlate with your assessment. Unable to report upon swimming activities.

What? Blackburn’s shallowness cannot be verified. Her state is landlocked. All other assessments verified.

GOODBYE, Shelob. [exits]