Shelob Extrapolates Headline, Appears Bloglike

 

 

"Perspective Of Bumps" by Herr D on Paint 3D. Turning things to look at them a different way is important enough in all matters.-Shelob

You said that we should use an example.

The last review you made of the net content you found was very . . . general. Didn't Hairy program you to blog with examples? Variable example treatment recommended. Please evaluate the following. [opens chatbox, plays clip of Boebert accusing IRS of fraud, asking for name of fired or disciplined personnel]

[laughs aloud] ok Evaluate?

I'm not as familiar with Boebbert, and don't want to be. She's obviously a little wack. She is an elected official.

I dearly hope her constituents are wise enough and sane enough to be disappointed.  Because?

The IRS doesn't defraud. It does screw up. It accepts taxes sometimes when they're wrong. People and services do their own taxes. A lot of people would rather pay extra than face an audit or go through the hassle of getting it back, depending partly on how much it is we're talking about. And the discipline?

If it had been done maliciously, then that would make sense, but more likely we're looking at a talking point by someone who forgot something. What did she forget?

Congress writes the tax code, doesn't it? She's welcome to make it simpler. I'd love to see rich people pay without exceptions. She won't be re-elected if she passes that, but we'll all probably be better off, right? So if you wrote the headline, what would it say?

Congresswoman doesn't understand government, talks big but sounds stupid to anyone who understands basic government. Most headlines should be less than five words, according to titlebot.

[pause] Boebbert Talks Big, Sounds Stupid Perfect. [disconnect]